cuatro.5.dos Regular Polysemy
All of our earliest variety of experiments also offers viewpoints for the question, what exactly is an acceptable computational model for normal polysemy? Specifically, i have shown that treatments for regular polysemy when it comes regarding separate kinds is not adequate. Remember that new inspiration to the studies presented inside section are brand new hypothesis you to polysemous adjectives exhibit a linguistic choices one gets involved in the earliest groups active in the normal polysemy, therefore yielding ability beliefs that are in the middle those of this new earliest classes (cf. Shape step one). Ergo, we’d expected you to polysemous adjectives form a good homogeneous band of lexical issues, defined precisely from the fact that they exhibit functions away from each classification to a certain extent. Yet not, that it assumption isn’t borne in the results of your own experiments. To that respect, it’s hitting one QR adjectives (polysemous ranging from a great qualitative and you may an excellent relational reading) was bequeath while in the every clusters in most options. They are certainly not defined as a great homogeneous classification, nor as unlike others. Crucially, since pointed out in Point 4 
.2, the distinctions within ability philosophy out-of polysemous adjectives and the ones of your basic categories commonly strong enough in order to inspire a good independent people.
We feel your cause for these show is that one to polysemous adjectives do not indeed have a great homogeneous, differentiated reputation: Inside the confirmed corpus, most adjectives can be used predominantly in just one of their sensory faculties, add up to among the basic kinds, meaning that the fresh new “hard” class which have around three clusters suits top. As an instance, the newest qualitative-relational adjective ironic (‘ironic’) is generally used while the a beneficial qualitative adjective regarding the corpus. Alternatively, militar (‘military’) is mainly put since a relational adjective, which will be continuously allotted to one of the relational clusters when you look at the the choices. For this reason, regardless of if polysemous adjectives on average create show a blended behavior, for each lexical product tends to trend that have one of several earliest groups. An option conceptualization regarding typical polysemy and you may experimental framework is called to own, and this will end up being the issue of your 2nd area.
The fresh experiments demonstrated in the last part pursued several goals: for the one hand, to check the first category proposition; on the other, to check a style of normal polysemy you to snacks polysemous adjectives when it comes to separate groups. With regards to the very first objective, this new studies within this part rely on the outcomes of your prior tests, and make use of the exact opposite class described into the Part step three.2. The alternative group possess at the same time been supported by an excellent clustering try perhaps not said right here for space explanations (get a hold of Boleda, Badia, and you will Batlle to possess info and you can dialogue).
Appropriately, they usually seems on qualitative groups
According to the second objective, you will find shown that basic model isn’t effective at modeling regular polysemy. Also, the analysis out-of function values in the previous section implies that the deficiency of achievements isn’t about this method included in the initial try, however, to the services away from polysemous adjectives: the fact that they are used predominantly in another of its senses, as well as the proven fact that brand new ability distributions from “polysemous groups” largely convergence with the ones from the fundamental groups.
In the current studies, we create a choice approach to regular polysemy that’s founded with the position one to polysemous adjectives belong to one or more semantic class, about build regarding multi-term category. A typical example of a multiple-title class activity are Text message Categorization (Schapire and you can Artist 2000), in which a file will likely be revealed thru multiple term (e.grams., Health and Local), as a result it efficiently falls under multiple of the address categories. The brand new motivation because of it the strategy is the fact that the polysemous adjectives showcase characteristics of all the kinds with it (find Area step 3.3). The brand new hypothesis is the fact that the research discover getting a beneficial polysemous adjective which is polysemous between, state, a beneficial relational and you will a qualitative have fun with is sufficiently strong enough for new adjective to be assigned to both the relational together with qualitative groups. Keep in mind that of the delegating the fresh new adjective towards a few groups individually, we create an enthusiastic implicit group of your adjective as the polysemous. The prosperity of the newest method is dependent upon if the various other sensory faculties was well enough portrayed about studies, and this will become specifically challenging to identify ranging from sounds and you may research to have a given class.